.
Feedback

All Breast Cancer Patients Deserve Safe Surgeries

State Senator Fran Pavley weighs in during Breast Cancer Awareness month.

One out of eight.

That’s the number of women who will get breast cancer in their lifetimes.

While a diagnosis of Cancer is frightening, there is good news for patients undergoing lumpectomies, which now is the most common breast cancer surgery nationwide.

Governor Brown signed a bill I authored, Senate Bill 255, into law. It ensures safe standards for women and men undergoing lumpectomy surgery in California. California enacted landmark legislation 14 years ago ending so-called “drive-thru mastectomies,” a practice some insurance companies used to send patients home from the hospital right after a mastectomy.  Unfortunately the law was murky when it came to lumpectomies - a less common surgery at the time.

Fortunately, medical technologies and best practices have rapidly advanced. While most breast cancer patients now have “breast conservation surgeries,” or lumpectomies, the law remained unclear about appropriate treatment for this surgery.

We heard testimony about one breast cancer patient who underwent a lumpectomy and was released right after her surgery. She had type II diabetes and was not in good overall health. This woman could have benefited from an overnight stay to ensure her diabetes was in balance and her wound care for the first 24 hours was done in a sterile environment.

Instead she went home, acquired a serious staph infection at the wound site and was hospitalized five days for treatment. Due to the infection, she required an emergency mastectomy and her recovery was triple the normal length of time. The patient’s time off work, follow-up treatment and recovery ended up more costly on the hospital, the medical system and taxpayers.

Senate Bill 255 ensures that the original protections for mastectomy patients will now apply to all breast cancer surgeries, including lumpectomies. It is up to a doctor and the patient to decide the length of the hospital stay and the law ensures insurance coverage for any surgery complications.

Most lumpectomy patients will not need additional care; however, some patients experience the exact same complications as mastectomy patients: excessive bleeding, drainage problems if lymph nodes are removed, anesthesia reactions and staph infections.Patients may also need additional help due
to other health issues, age and other factors.

This law was sponsored by the California Affiliates of Susan G. Komen for Cure and supported by many organizations. SB 255 ensures mastectomy and lumpectomy patients will receive equal treatment under the law – a crucial clarification for providers, payers and patients to ensure the best health outcomes.

One out of eight women deserve safe surgery treatment no matter what course of action they choose.

California State Senator Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sherman Oaks Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
A. Abrams May 19, 2013 at 06:05 pm
As a parent who spent over 12 hours on site volunteering at CHAMPSFEST, I must say that CHAMPSRead More Parent's assessment above of the circumstances is exactly correct.
CHAMPS Parent May 19, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Dear Hollietiger, CHAMPSFEST2013 was an awesome experience for my child. She was there all day andRead More had the best time. When I dropped her off I saw a slew of security personnel checking bags and wanding. She told me security was there immediately and a medic on hand. Her friend is fine and is going to school Monday morning. The hammer was from a vendor. The kid could have grabbed one of the stakes from a tent or a chair. Things happen, but I trust that the school and the administrators did the right thing. It's very counter productive and irresponsible to write things when you don't know the facts. I will support and trust CHAMPS and my daughter is already looking forward to next years CHAMPSFEST.
Evan Sanford May 19, 2013 at 05:02 pm
First of all, I don't know where your child got his information but he is quite uninformed. HeRead More obviously was believing all the rumors spreading at then end of the event. The victim's skull WAS NOT "cracked open and ... bleeding everywhere." CHAMPSFEST 2013 was a public event, therefore open to the PUBLIC. CHAMPS (the school) has no control of mental competency of attendants from other schools. Security was there in droves to protect the entire venue. As far as nothing being reported that is also FALSE. The kid was NOT taken away in handcuffs. Police were there and it is confidential information that was not released to the general population and is not a matter of public record. Second of all, the resources provided by the city were there as a backup (you mentioned "2 ambulances, police fire trucks... Not really sure what police fire trucks are but that's besides the point). We wanted to make sure that in this case of emergency all bases were covered and the safety of the victim was going to be treated properly. Next time you hear about an incident, I would consider the reputation of the people who worked so hard to put on the event and let them handle the situation before posting incorrect information to the entire community.