.
Feedback

DWP Chief Makes Case for Rate Hikes

Speaking in Sherman Oaks, the utility's Ron Nichols blames aging pipes, government regulations and other factors for driving up water, electricity costs.

Residents who came to the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association meeting Thursday to give an earful to Ron Nichols—head of the city’s Department of Water and Power—over proposed water and electric rate hikes, instead got an earful from him.

Nichols, DWP general manager for the past 10 months, listed state and federal requirements, looming time deadlines, aging pipes and environmental mandates that are costing the DWP billions of dollars.

“We’re going through some absolutely unprecedented changes,” he said, “the vast majority of which are outside of our control. ... All those things are driving our costs.”

Rate increases of about 5 percent annually for electricity and water over the next three years originally proposed for Nov. 1 this year are on hold until a ratepayer advocate is appointed, perhaps as soon as January, to review the proposed increases, he said.

Among the cost drivers is the federal government, Nichols explained, which requires water reservoirs be covered. Los Angeles has more open reservoirs than any other city. Five have been covered so far and five more remain, he said.

To meet federal air quality requirements Los Angeles reduced by half the amount of water it withdraws from Owens Lake in Inyo County to limit the amount of dust kicked up when the water evaporates. That and other dust-reduction requirements have cost the utility $1 billion over the last decade, he said.

The city’s own aging infrastructure also imposes costs. The city has 7,200 miles of water pipes, some of them 100 years old, yet replaces only 18 to 25 miles of pipe yearly.

“You do the math,” Nichols said. “That’s about 300 to 400 years to replace them. Pipes don’t last 300 to 400 years.”

As a result, city crews repair about three or four broken pipes daily, he said.

On the power side, the city has three natural gas-fired plants that pull in seawater for cooling, which the federal government has banned because of the negative impact on marine life. The city must build new power units at a cost of $2.2 billion with a 2029 deadline, Nichols said.

Federal environmental regulations banning coal-fired power plants would end Los Angeles’ arrangements with the Navajo Plant in Arizona and the Intermountain Power Facility in Utah when those contracts expire and bring additional costs.

Meanwhile, the state wants utilities to receive 30 percent of their energy from renewable energy by 2020 and also requires utilities to provide rebates to homeowners for solar energy projects. For DWP, the rebates come to $30 million annually. Another $800 million yearly is spent on replacing utility poles some of which are 50 to 70 years old, Nichols said.

Despite this litany, a questioner at Thursday’s SOHA meeting asked why water rates were going up even with successful conservation efforts to reduce consumption.

“If you weren’t doing conservation, we would be buying more water from MWD [Metropolitan Water District of Southern California] and your rates would be higher,” Nichols said.

“I know it’s hard to stand, cutting back and cutting back,” he added, “but the answer is, [without conservation] your rates would be higher yet.”

Before heading DWP, Nichols spent 35 years in the energy and water utility industry, specializing in developing and financing utility infrastructures and systems. In California he brought new electricity contracts to help solve the state’s 2000-2001 energy crisis and, in 2007, assisted in evaluating how carbon levels and electricity costs could be reduced statewide and in the West using energy efficiencies and renewable energy.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sherman Oaks Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
A. Abrams May 19, 2013 at 06:05 pm
As a parent who spent over 12 hours on site volunteering at CHAMPSFEST, I must say that CHAMPSRead More Parent's assessment above of the circumstances is exactly correct.
CHAMPS Parent May 19, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Dear Hollietiger, CHAMPSFEST2013 was an awesome experience for my child. She was there all day andRead More had the best time. When I dropped her off I saw a slew of security personnel checking bags and wanding. She told me security was there immediately and a medic on hand. Her friend is fine and is going to school Monday morning. The hammer was from a vendor. The kid could have grabbed one of the stakes from a tent or a chair. Things happen, but I trust that the school and the administrators did the right thing. It's very counter productive and irresponsible to write things when you don't know the facts. I will support and trust CHAMPS and my daughter is already looking forward to next years CHAMPSFEST.
Evan Sanford May 19, 2013 at 05:02 pm
First of all, I don't know where your child got his information but he is quite uninformed. HeRead More obviously was believing all the rumors spreading at then end of the event. The victim's skull WAS NOT "cracked open and ... bleeding everywhere." CHAMPSFEST 2013 was a public event, therefore open to the PUBLIC. CHAMPS (the school) has no control of mental competency of attendants from other schools. Security was there in droves to protect the entire venue. As far as nothing being reported that is also FALSE. The kid was NOT taken away in handcuffs. Police were there and it is confidential information that was not released to the general population and is not a matter of public record. Second of all, the resources provided by the city were there as a backup (you mentioned "2 ambulances, police fire trucks... Not really sure what police fire trucks are but that's besides the point). We wanted to make sure that in this case of emergency all bases were covered and the safety of the victim was going to be treated properly. Next time you hear about an incident, I would consider the reputation of the people who worked so hard to put on the event and let them handle the situation before posting incorrect information to the entire community.