Please don't get the wrong idea, but there are lots of ways that men are sort of like, well, dogs!
Here's what I mean: like dogs, men WANT to be our Knights in Shining Armor, don't they?
Think about it. They want to provide for us. They want us to be happy. They just don't know how to go about it.
Of course, men don't have crystal balls...opps! I mean a crystal ball. As much as we might wish it, men cannot read our minds, we have to sort of lead them in the direction we want them to go.
Dogs are the same way. It is up to us to explain to our dogs in a language that they will understand what is expected of them. Of course,we need to learn our dog's language: the language of the pack.
Being pack animals, dogs want someone to be the leader of the pack. If someone doesn't take on that leadership role, they will reluctantly do it because in the dog's head SOMEONE has to do it.
By making sure your dog knows that you are the leader he is looking for, and what kind of behavior is expected, you can prevent him from acting out.
Remember, our world is a big scary place for dogs, they will act out of frustration by pulling on the leash, barking inappropriately, taking a bite out of the couch, or whatever unique way your pet has of " acting out" their own frustration.
Once they know what is expected of them they will happily play and stay within the boundaries that you set for them.
The same thing is true with men. if you were to say to a man, "I hate it when do do that," and you add, "you know what would really make me happy," and then explain whatever that is; you'll find that they will provide that kind of behavior.
If men and dogs know how to make you happy and they love you, they will provide.
( dogs, women, men and children) if we learn their language with respect and love.
They is NO possible way a male could have written anything close to what you said about a woman and get away with it, so how is it correct that you can post a sexist article against men acting as a animal activist? I did not misinterpret your point, just because you said "don't get the wrong idea, but" in your Patch article gives you an opening for a sexist platform, hiding behind a want to be animal activist title. Please don't take this wrong...I figure the only way to deal with a bitch, oops, sorry, female is to make you understand on your terms.
You could be right! Nice to see you're actually a person (woman) with some brain matter. I have heard of the TV show "Dog Whisper", I don't think Cesar would have EVER printed anything like this article with a sexist attitude towards women using any animal as an example! If fact I donated a web domain to him, www.bethepackleader.com. It's obvious a "light hearted" approach was tried in this so called article to help women understand their dogs. Another extreme example of a "light hearted" approach to comedy was the MIchael Richards "joke" using a racial slur. What? No, the difference is actually the same as Karen being a sexist hiding behind a "animal activist" name to spew her attitude towards men. Why does this article truly upset me? Because any "man" could NEVER get away with posting an article about women and fish! Oops, pretty bad right? Yeah, right! Please don't take that wrong….That last sentence does NOT give me a comedic excuse to demean women, oh I'm sorry, to have a "light hearted" article about women and a gill bearing aquatic vertebra! Dweebie, keep your shock collar for yourself...
and he is such a great person but appalled by your comments. thanks Patti
I am sorry! As i said before the article was changed and edited in a way that i didn't intend.
I own, created and maintain the Animal Welfare Committee website. The website at this point is being used to let everyone know your inner interest and it's obvious, it's not about helping the animals first, YOUR sexist attitude towards men is being used behind the veil of being an animal activist! That's pretty pathetic, plain and simple to read through! I wish I could have been first in writing about women the way your wrote about men. I wonder if you would have commented about that article?
What right does this guy have of attempting to control and make people suffer over his own insecurities. I will not be blackmailed! This is the kind of mind-set indicative of the corporate bully take-over. By the way, while i am on the subject...This is the kind of behavior that will not longer be tolerated as we continue down our road on our evolution and paradigm shift. The world is changing, we are moving away from the controlling, manipulated and competitive world view. The age of deceit, corruption and suffering are falling away. Old structures and false value systems are disappearing and making room for integrity, connecting, community and compassion.We must learn to live in Natural Harmony with all living creatures of the Earth, including, dare I say it...Ok, here it goes... men...yes still light-hearted honesty!! Thank you for your support!
Sherman Oaks can use it, then PLEASE make contact with Jeff Ebebstein, he is in charge of the Animal Welfare Committee of the Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council. Please give your time for helping the people with animals in Sherman Oaks and the world… www.animalwelfarecommittee.com Free speech is great, I should know. Corporate owed websites will always be subject to free speech problems. Post your thoughts on your own website and show the world you are sexists towards men, I dare you, put your mouth were your thoughts are, you did it once, on the Patch. Wow, that sounded pretty manly if I say so myself... And I as a man will not be thrown in the gutter from a bitch, oops sorry, female dog sexist USING animals as a platform. You were called out and are a really piece of hufemity.
You must really have it in your heart to help, did you not ever check the SONC website before, the info has been posted for years. Heck I even posted it on my website. Here is some more background for you. I signed up, along with many others to help Jeff Ebenstein to try and get the SONC Animal Welfare Committee going. Unfortunately after a so-so try the committee never got off the ground but to Jeff's credit and others he has kept the SONC abreast of Los Angeles city animal rights problems and has recommended to the SO council to back many pro animal rights agendas. So "I" started this website myself and it has nothing to do with the SONC. I pay and maintain this website myself with many animal loving people emailing me subject matter to post. It's just a small something I feel good about doing for myself and animals. And now with your, I guess, expertise the people of Sherman Oaks will have a superior and better website for animal information. You will create and maintain "a decent looking website that actually delivers pertinent information", won't you? So I guess, standing up to someone who is demeaning is wrong? That "place" has been around for awhile but people like Karen keep shoving you back in time! Please bring attention to any other Patch article in which a man was as demeaning to women as Karen was demeaning to men. If you don't know how to play the game get off the field!
That "place" CAN happen a lot faster if we all were to visualize it as the most likely future scenario, past all of the 'HEAD" consciousness and focus on the "Heart" consciousness! You are so right about the 'gutter"comment, people like Scott who are vibrating at such a low energy level are their own worst enemy.
always has terrific problems with men in the area of superiority. I don't think she ever bow wowed enough men to quelch their need for being the alpha-dog since she cut them at the ......immediately. I hope she learns the message of a two-way street with her dogs and men.