Without New Revenue, L.A. Is on the Brink, Analyst Warns

"The era of doing one time solutions really has to end," he says.

The city's top budget analyst warned city leaders Friday if they don't stop using one-time fixes to close budget deficits, the city could go the way of Stockton, which is seeking to declare bankruptcy.

In a sobering 52-page report, City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana warned officials the city's costs are growing faster than its revenue. The report predicts the city will run more than $300 million in the red through 2015.     "It is very clear that we cannot survive the next four years without continuing to reduce our expenditures and increase revenues on an ongoing basis," Santana said. "The era of doing one time solutions really has to end."

The report, billed as a strategic plan to get the city's budget back on track, recommends a mix of cost-cutting and revenue generating solutions. They include using money from parking meters to fund basic city services, asking voters to approve tax increases on property sales and parking lots and reducing how much the city spends on salaries, pensions, health care and workers' compensation benefits.

According to the report, employee costs will rise an average 4.3 percent per year through 2016, while revenue for the city's general fund is only expected to grow 2.3 percent per year.

The lion's share of employee costs come from health care, and Santana recommends having city workers pay 10 percent of the cost of their health care benefits -- most pay less than 1 percent.

He said the city also cannot afford to pay raises promised to thousands of workers in 2007, when the housing market led city officials to believe the city's revenue would continue to go up.

Deputy city attorneys are scheduled to receive a 6.75 percent increase next year, while most of the rest of the city's civilian workforce is set to get 11 percent raises over the next two years. Eliminating the raises would save the city about $50 million, the report states.

Santana refuted an idea advocated in recent weeks by candidates for mayor and city controller that doing a better job collecting money owed to the city would dramatically improve the city's finances.

"While there is certainly room for improvement in the city's billing and collections operations, the idea that the city's financial woes and structural deficit can be solved through improvements in collections is a myth," Santana wrote in the report.

Most of the city's uncollected debt is in the form of unpaid parking tickets or bills for emergency service from the Los Angeles Fire Department. That debt is either old and never going to be paid or owed by people that are indigent or dead, the report states.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is heeding the report, according to spokesman Peter Sanders.

"In order to eliminate the structural deficit, it is clear that we will need a balance between cuts in spending and an increase in our revenue base," Sanders said. "The Mayor's budget, to be released April 20th, will advance some of the concepts discussed in the CAO's report."

-- City News Service

Sean McCarthy April 08, 2012 at 05:14 PM
The city must put up or shut up before anyone should support new taxes. Where are the city worker layoffs? I'm not talking about the usual city bookkeeping gimmicks, made to look like layoffs but real layoffs. Where is the city reducing its overhead like selling surplus land or renting out property that can generate rent income? Is the city really going after the scofflaws that are not paying their share of parking taxes collected? Every time the city talks about new taxes we learn that it has failed to police its employee’s use of gas cards and debit cards. What has Bud Ovrom done to clean up the city Building and Safety department? Has anyone asked? Does anyone in City Hall care? This taxpayer needs to see real reforms implemented before they should agree to higher taxes. It will likely be a year before anything happens, after the next city elections. That's when the real hard choices will be made.
Caitlin April 14, 2012 at 10:14 PM
Excellent points--We're all sick of getting milked by the city and it's employees. It's unfair bilking and should be against the law. You won't see me voting for anyone in office currently in the next elections.
Wilton M Madison Jr April 15, 2012 at 04:31 PM
homeless people have skills. of all kinds.and would rather work than get hand outs from the state.I see homes everyday that I could make livable and I am homeless. if we stop judging each other and replace it with Gods Word faith and love we may have a better chance.
Scott Killeen April 16, 2012 at 01:50 AM
This city is obviously out of control! The more taxes I pay the less I receive, so WHY should I vote for a tax increase? The city utilities were just raised 5% per year for three years in a row and now it's not good enough...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »