.
Feedback

Councilman Paul Koretz Responds to Chabad Opposition

In an email to Patch today, Koretz makes a measured statement.

Wednesday, Patch published on Chandler Boulevard in Sherman Oaks. 

In that piece, we quoted Mitch Ramin, who lives two doors west on Chandler from Chabad, as saying Councilman Paul Koretz had been largely unresponsive to the needs of the residents: 

“[Koretz] said he can’t do anything," Ramin stated, "it’s up to the City Attorney. But Koretz is the mayor here; he has all the control. The city attorney says that it’s up to the decision-makers, meaning Koretz. But Koretz will not touch this.”

Though we were unable to reach the councilman on the phone Wednesday, his Planning Deputy Sean Bayliss promised he'd speak to Koretz and have a statement by the end of the day. What follows is that statement.

"Synagogues and other houses of worship are of extraordinary importance to our communities," wrote Councilman Koretz.  

"That said, the size and scope of any large project is of valid concern to a neighborhood, which is why I believe community input is invaluable."

"Prior to my taking office, this synagogue was fully entitled and the matter was embroiled in litigation. The situation that I inherited was a mess and, sad to say, full of vitriol."

"My staff and I immediately and repeatedly encouraged both sides to meet, talk face to face, and reach common ground. Indeed, we have hosted such meetings, in hopes of some mutual accommodation. I have met with both sides on multiple occasions to discuss the issues and hear the concerns, and have pushed for an open and fair process."

"The Appellant Court recently concluded that a small number of the final elements, dating back to when my predecessor was in office, were not done correctly and needed to be revisited. The City is complying with that court order -- including, at my urging, by allowing the public the opportunity to voice its concerns in front of the Council's Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) committee. I look forward to that public input in front of the committee."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sherman Oaks Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
A. Abrams May 19, 2013 at 06:05 pm
As a parent who spent over 12 hours on site volunteering at CHAMPSFEST, I must say that CHAMPSRead More Parent's assessment above of the circumstances is exactly correct.
CHAMPS Parent May 19, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Dear Hollietiger, CHAMPSFEST2013 was an awesome experience for my child. She was there all day andRead More had the best time. When I dropped her off I saw a slew of security personnel checking bags and wanding. She told me security was there immediately and a medic on hand. Her friend is fine and is going to school Monday morning. The hammer was from a vendor. The kid could have grabbed one of the stakes from a tent or a chair. Things happen, but I trust that the school and the administrators did the right thing. It's very counter productive and irresponsible to write things when you don't know the facts. I will support and trust CHAMPS and my daughter is already looking forward to next years CHAMPSFEST.
Evan Sanford May 19, 2013 at 05:02 pm
First of all, I don't know where your child got his information but he is quite uninformed. HeRead More obviously was believing all the rumors spreading at then end of the event. The victim's skull WAS NOT "cracked open and ... bleeding everywhere." CHAMPSFEST 2013 was a public event, therefore open to the PUBLIC. CHAMPS (the school) has no control of mental competency of attendants from other schools. Security was there in droves to protect the entire venue. As far as nothing being reported that is also FALSE. The kid was NOT taken away in handcuffs. Police were there and it is confidential information that was not released to the general population and is not a matter of public record. Second of all, the resources provided by the city were there as a backup (you mentioned "2 ambulances, police fire trucks... Not really sure what police fire trucks are but that's besides the point). We wanted to make sure that in this case of emergency all bases were covered and the safety of the victim was going to be treated properly. Next time you hear about an incident, I would consider the reputation of the people who worked so hard to put on the event and let them handle the situation before posting incorrect information to the entire community.