.
Feedback

UPDATE: Officer Shoots at Man Near Trader Joe's in Sherman Oaks

A confrontation occurs at Hazeltine Avenue and Riverside Drive at 6:35 p.m, police say.

UPDATE 6 a.m. Wednesday

A search was under way Wednesday for a man who was fired at by Los Angeles police after he allegedly tried to run down at least one officer with a van in the parking lot of a Trader Joe's in Sherman Oaks.

Two patrolling officers from the Van Nuys Station were in the parking lot at Hazeltine Avenue and Riverside Drive at 6:35 p.m. Tuesday when they saw the suspect being chased by two store employees, said Detective Gus Villanueva of the Los Angeles Police Department's Media Relations Section.

"The officers formed the opinion that a robbery just occurred. They tried to intervene. The suspect entered a white van, at which point he sped off, almost striking one or both of the officers," Villanueva said.

"At that point an officer-involved shooting occurred and the suspect took off in the vehicle out of the parking lot onto Hazeltine and then southbound onto Hazeltine."

Neither officer was injured, said Villanueva, who did not know if one or both officers opened fire. Investigators do not know if the suspect was struck, he said.

"No one has shown up at a hospital that we know of," Villanueva said early today.

The property where the shooting is shared by a Trader Joe's grocery store and a bank and is across the street from Westfield Fashion Square. The shooting was under investigation by the LAPD's Force Investigation Division, Villanueva said.

Anyone with information about the suspect was asked to contact the Van Nuys Station at (818) 374-9500.

Around 6:50 p.m., multiple LAPD cars and an LAPD helicopter swarmed the area of Radford Avenue and Magnolia Boulevard in Valley Village. Officers pulled over and handcuffed at least two men who were driving a white van. An officer at the scene described the men as shooting suspects, but they were quickly questioned and released.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sherman Oaks Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
A. Abrams May 19, 2013 at 06:05 pm
As a parent who spent over 12 hours on site volunteering at CHAMPSFEST, I must say that CHAMPSRead More Parent's assessment above of the circumstances is exactly correct.
CHAMPS Parent May 19, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Dear Hollietiger, CHAMPSFEST2013 was an awesome experience for my child. She was there all day andRead More had the best time. When I dropped her off I saw a slew of security personnel checking bags and wanding. She told me security was there immediately and a medic on hand. Her friend is fine and is going to school Monday morning. The hammer was from a vendor. The kid could have grabbed one of the stakes from a tent or a chair. Things happen, but I trust that the school and the administrators did the right thing. It's very counter productive and irresponsible to write things when you don't know the facts. I will support and trust CHAMPS and my daughter is already looking forward to next years CHAMPSFEST.
Evan Sanford May 19, 2013 at 05:02 pm
First of all, I don't know where your child got his information but he is quite uninformed. HeRead More obviously was believing all the rumors spreading at then end of the event. The victim's skull WAS NOT "cracked open and ... bleeding everywhere." CHAMPSFEST 2013 was a public event, therefore open to the PUBLIC. CHAMPS (the school) has no control of mental competency of attendants from other schools. Security was there in droves to protect the entire venue. As far as nothing being reported that is also FALSE. The kid was NOT taken away in handcuffs. Police were there and it is confidential information that was not released to the general population and is not a matter of public record. Second of all, the resources provided by the city were there as a backup (you mentioned "2 ambulances, police fire trucks... Not really sure what police fire trucks are but that's besides the point). We wanted to make sure that in this case of emergency all bases were covered and the safety of the victim was going to be treated properly. Next time you hear about an incident, I would consider the reputation of the people who worked so hard to put on the event and let them handle the situation before posting incorrect information to the entire community.