.
Feedback

Man Convicted of Tire Slashing Back in Jail

After early release from jail, Colin Onu was arrested on suspicion of battery.

The man convicted of slashing tires in north Sherman Oaks is back in jail after being arrested on suspicion of battery this week.

Colin Onu, 44, who was convicted in April of slashing tires and possessing a controlled substance, was sentenced to 180 days in Los Angeles County Jail, but he was released after serving 11 days.

"Don't get me started on that," said Tamar Galatzan, neighborhood prosecutor in the Los Angeles city attorney's  office, speaking of Onu's early release from jail.

"We convicted this guy of slashing people's tires in his apartment complex; we suspected him of being involved in the rash of tire slashings in Sherman Oaks, but we got him for the one where he lived and also on the drug charge," said Galatzan. "But they released him early."

Police in Sherman Oaks reported 15 instances of tire slashing in mid-March, but they had no leads until a resident of an apartment complex in the 4200 block of Murietta Avenue called officers to say that someone was slashing tires in the parking lot of that building.

When officers arrived at the scene they arrested Onu.

"Turned out he lived at the place where several people had their tires slashed,"  Galatzan said.

Onu was convicted of one count of misdemeanor vandalism, in addition to two counts of possession, which were also misdemeanors. A motive in the tire-slashing incidents was never established.

"Shortly after being released he moved back to the same place where they arrested him in Sherman Oaks, and then was arrested for battery, so now he's back in jail," Galatzan said.

A court hearing in the battery case is scheduled for May 25.

Police do not release the names of victims in battery cases.

While the rash of tire slashings was occurring, police were not sure if they were being committed by one person or more than one.

Since Onu's April arrest, police say there have been no tire slashings in the north Sherman Oaks area.

An earlier story on the tire slashings can be viewed at patch.com/A-gtgQ.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sherman Oaks Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
A. Abrams May 19, 2013 at 06:05 pm
As a parent who spent over 12 hours on site volunteering at CHAMPSFEST, I must say that CHAMPSRead More Parent's assessment above of the circumstances is exactly correct.
CHAMPS Parent May 19, 2013 at 05:43 pm
Dear Hollietiger, CHAMPSFEST2013 was an awesome experience for my child. She was there all day andRead More had the best time. When I dropped her off I saw a slew of security personnel checking bags and wanding. She told me security was there immediately and a medic on hand. Her friend is fine and is going to school Monday morning. The hammer was from a vendor. The kid could have grabbed one of the stakes from a tent or a chair. Things happen, but I trust that the school and the administrators did the right thing. It's very counter productive and irresponsible to write things when you don't know the facts. I will support and trust CHAMPS and my daughter is already looking forward to next years CHAMPSFEST.
Evan Sanford May 19, 2013 at 05:02 pm
First of all, I don't know where your child got his information but he is quite uninformed. HeRead More obviously was believing all the rumors spreading at then end of the event. The victim's skull WAS NOT "cracked open and ... bleeding everywhere." CHAMPSFEST 2013 was a public event, therefore open to the PUBLIC. CHAMPS (the school) has no control of mental competency of attendants from other schools. Security was there in droves to protect the entire venue. As far as nothing being reported that is also FALSE. The kid was NOT taken away in handcuffs. Police were there and it is confidential information that was not released to the general population and is not a matter of public record. Second of all, the resources provided by the city were there as a backup (you mentioned "2 ambulances, police fire trucks... Not really sure what police fire trucks are but that's besides the point). We wanted to make sure that in this case of emergency all bases were covered and the safety of the victim was going to be treated properly. Next time you hear about an incident, I would consider the reputation of the people who worked so hard to put on the event and let them handle the situation before posting incorrect information to the entire community.